Re nurses against getting the COVID vaccine:
Most of them (including physicians and parents by the way!) likely have witnessed vaccine injury (prior to the COVID pandemic) and some have testified to this fact in interviews—specifically re the MMR and HPV vaccines so I'm not surprised at all. Watch VAXXED & VAXXED2.
...and yet so many youtube videos over the last year or so have disappeared (not deleted by me) from my saved youtube videos on this topic of professional testimonies critical of vaccine schedules and ingredients. Certainly proprietary pressure is responsible for the censure.
Microchip fears are truly ludicrous! But a reluctance to VOLUNTEER to participate however seems justifiable. I've listened to so many professional testimonies re vaccine ingredients and injury PRIOR to the "pandemic" so the non-conformity of a 30-45 percentage of nurses does not surprise me.
The issue for those in general though who distrust the pharmaceuticals, the WHO, the CDC and the physicians promoting vaccination, is the proprietarily subverted "science" if not criminal negligence. The Promoters' use of the terms "anti-vaxxers" & "anti-science" mischaracterizes this valid criticism....
The term "conspiracy theorists" as well relies on logical fallacy. It avoids defending a conflict of interest, & the valid issues of proprietary gain vs the precautionary principle & legitimate skepticism of science.
Ultimately this professional conformity divide is at root the line created by the unresolvable "greater good" vs "right of the individual to prefer self-preservation" presumption of a dominant argument.
That is, An absolute balance between "duty" and "freedom of choice" is unsustainable. Arguing for experimenting on an entire population then is indefensible!
No comments:
Post a Comment