I think transparency necessitates going further back than immediate personal experience of any particular troublesome professional event—to textbook publishers & med schools for example. Graduates are forced to trust them for the sake of their own claim to authority and respect, & thus their professional lives are beholding to industrial interests & therefore their ethics are in jeopardy (conflict of interest).
ie., the pharmaceutical industry could care less about the front line's emotional responses to the challenge of representing the faceless face of a business modeled healthcare industry!
The anxiety then of the growing numbers of scientists who support for example informed consent re vaccination is the result of the "sounds-like-a-personal-problem" attitude of a business that expects only complacency, not the legitimate skepticism of a scientist.
All businesses (especially including proprietary science stakeholders) do not like scrutiny & will fight it ruthlessly without compunction—for a business is not a "natural person" & therefore has no more emotion than igneous rock! We free thinkers, independent academics and scientists however will eventually break through this monied crust with a molton force. True science evolves. It cannot remain stagnant anymore than a tectonic plate.
No comments:
Post a Comment